Determining value in organizations : myths, norms, facts and values.

SelectedWorks Author Profiles:

Christopher J. Davis

Document Type


Publication Date


Date Issued


Date Available



Whether carried out by external consultants or internally, evaluation of business activity frequently relies on the use of criteria that arise from industry norms, benchmarking or other sources outside the organization. The research presented in this paper questions the utility of measures that use such criteria. Based on the authors' research, we show how reliance on predetermined criteria can simultaneously ossify the evaluation process and alienate the organizational community being evaluated. We aim to show how systems theory can provide a means to address the shortcomings of contemporary evaluation practice. Techniques that enable systems concepts to be operationalized in the work setting are described and the results of their use are discussed. By challenging the dominance of rational economic evaluation criteria, the paper provides an agenda for change for managers, evaluators and researchers.


Abstract only. Full-text article is available through licensed access provided by the publisher. Published in Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 22: 525-536. doi: 10.1002/sres.686. Members of the USF System may access the full-text of the article through the authenticated link provided.




John Wiley & Sons

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.